FedoraReview

#167 Empty file list handing incorrect (Was:"No built package" error when there is no base package)
Closed: Fixed Opened by leamas.

Closed: Fixed
Reopen Issue

If a spec file does not define a base package, f-r runs into problems after completed build looking for a non-existing base-package.

Testcase: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330#c10

Fixed in 997b0f4c698899774ec36e4

The fix is broken. Problem is that it does not differ the case when there's an empty %files section from a not-existing section. An empty section is valid, indicating an empty (e. g., meta) package, whereas a not-existing section will not generate any binary package.

Fixed, again, inf51f7fcd66aa6672945
Metadata
None
None
None
None
None
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.