@ramyaparimi @lilyx If both of you have a moment, could you please take a look at this Pull Request and leave your feedback (+1 or -1 with comment) before it is merged?

@bee2502 @jonatoni @amsharma @tatica If you all have a moment, your feedback is also welcome since you were here when we put together the first survey draft.

@jflory7 +1
This LGTM :thumbsup:

@jflory7 +1

I was just curious about the questions regarding country and regions of residence around lines 160ish.
If we are asking for country of residence, is the question on region of residence necessary? particularly given the size of the regions specified. Would it be more beneficial to ask for country of residence and then country of origin, our just leave it at country of residence and then group the data into relevant regions for analysis later?

Not a huge deal, it looks great all around, just thought that this stood out as an odd redundancy.

@ramyaparimi @lilyx Thanks for reviewing and leaving feedback!

From the D&I Team meeting today, I pushed commit 6416042882c978d16cec883c3a575d6cdef7070a with explicit clarification that the survey is no longer being actively worked on.

@lilyx The country/region of residence redundancy is a good catch. At the time we wrote these questions, we were considering this way because there are a few countries that Fedora cannot ask about or does not recognize because Red Hat's legal jurisdiction does not recognize them, e.g. Iran, Kosovo. The region question was a way for us to work around this sticky legal barrier with U.S. trade embargoes and sanctions. You would never believe it was so hard to just ask someone where they are from!

I agree it is in redundant in practice, and maybe we don't actually want to ask for country of residence after all. But for now, I will keep it there to reflect historical accuracy of our conversations back in 2015/2016.

I'm going to go ahead and merge this through. Thanks again both for reviewing :tada: