Issue #817: Consider dropping GCJ Guidelines - packaging-committee

packaging-committee

#817 Consider dropping GCJ Guidelines

Closed: Fixed Oct 23, 2018 Opened Oct 22, 2018 by mizdebsk.

GCJ Guidelines is obsolete. Very few packages are still following it. GCJ is not even included in Fedora any longer - GCJ was removed from GCC 7+

ignatenkobrain commented Oct 22, 2018

what about

guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/Java.adoc
103:Note that GCJ packages contain `.so` files in `+%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}+` but they are not JNI `.so` files.

Metadata Update from @ignatenkobrain:
- Issue assigned to ignatenkobrain

Oct 22, 2018

mizdebsk commented Oct 22, 2018

IMHO reference to GCJ in Java Guidelines can be removed too - GCJ and %{_libdir}/libgcj do not exist in Fedora any longer.

ignatenkobrain commented Oct 23, 2018

Commit 16f242e0 fixes this issue

Metadata

Assignee

ignatenkobrain

Tags

None

Blocking

None

Depending on

None

Priority

packaging-committee

#817 Consider dropping GCJ Guidelines Closed: Fixed Oct 23, 2018 Opened Oct 22, 2018 by mizdebsk.

Metadata

#817 Consider dropping GCJ Guidelines

Closed: Fixed Oct 23, 2018 Opened Oct 22, 2018 by mizdebsk.