@fujiwara You are looking at wrong location. Since i386 is an alternate architecture, we sync the rpm's to a different location.

They could be found at https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/updates/29/Everything/i386/Packages/i/

I don't think above should be the answer. This is multilib package and if it is not a multilib then why ibus*.i686 packages are tagged in this compose => https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/i/ ?

The way multilib packages are calculated is that all -devel subpackages are multilib, and anything that they require is added as multilib. (There are also whitelists and blacklists that add extra packages; I've forgotten where these are.)

Looks like there was a packaging change in ibus between 1.5.19-4.fc29 and 1.5.19-9.fc29 and ibus-devel now no longer pulls in ibus. This caused ibus to stop being multilib, which in turn caused ibus-gtk2 and ibus-gtk3 to stop being multilib.

Right. now the dependencies are deleted in 1.5.19-9.fc29 for flatpak.
Actually ibus itself is not multilib but ibus-gtk2 and ibus-gtk3 are multilib.
dnf install ibus-gtk3.i686 does not pull 1.5.19-9.fc29 but 1.5.19-4.fc29.
updates/29/Everything/x86_64/Packages/ includes ibus-gtk2.i686 but no ibus-gtk3.i686 and it's strange with me?

Oh hm, I guess something pulls in ibus-gtk2 somehow then.

I found the whitelist now -- maybe just add ibus-gtk2 and ibus-gtk3 to multilib_whitelist in https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/fedora.conf ? If you do a PR @mohanboddu can review it when he gets in.

I created a PR of https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/675
I'd request it to master and f29.

@fujiwara Merged the master PR, but dont create f29 as we are not producing any of those artifacts anymore.

For updates, I will send a patch to ansible git repo where we store our pungi configs for bodhi.

@mohanboddu Thank you.