I noticed that python-jeepney is orphaned, and is an indirect requirement of urlwatch which I want to continue to use. But I also note that orphan is only one of three maintainers, besides churchyard and python-sig. The wiki page about new maintainers for orphaned packages says the old maintainer would ask any co-maintainers if they want to take over. I'm not sure to what extend this still applies, as the PkgDB isn't active any more. I'm not sure if the distinction between maintainers and co-maintainers is still relevant.
So the bottom line is, if the package python-jeepney does need a new maintainer, I'll try to take over and keep it up-to-date. But I most certainly don't want to cut in line; if the package's other maintainers want to "keep" it I will keep my fingers away.
How should I proceed?
@goeran Now you are the owner for python-jeepney.
Thanks for picking up the package.
Metadata Update from @mohanboddu: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)